LinkedIn Engagement Boost: Women Find Better Results By Presenting to be Men
Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?
If not, the reason could be your gender.
The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach
Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.
Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.
Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up
The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who employ online business jargon.
Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.
Platform Response
In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.
Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.
Individual Results
A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.
"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.
Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease significantly.
The Method
- First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
- Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
- Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" style
The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.
The Downside
Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.
"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."
She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."
Mixed Results
Some testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.
"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.
Broader Implications
These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.
Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.
Technical Explanation
Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.
The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."
A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.
Evolving Environment
According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.
"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."