🔗 Share this article

Picture this: a happy Rasmus Højlund wearing Napoli's colors. Now, place it with a dejected the Slovenian forward sporting United's jersey, looking as if he's missed a sitter. Don't worry finding an actual photo of that miss; context is your adversary. Then, add some goal stats in a large, silly font. Remember the emojis. Share the image everywhere.

Would you point out that Højlund's goal count includes scores in the Champions League while his counterpart isn't playing in Europe? Of course not. And will you highlight that four of the Dane's goals came against weaker national sides, or that Denmark is much stronger to Sesko's Slovenia and generates far more scoring opportunities. You run online for a major brand, pure engagement is what pays the bills, United are the prime target, and nuance is the thing to avoid.

So the wheel of online material turns. Your next task is to sift through a lengthy podcast with the legendary goalkeeper and extract the part where he describes the acquisition of Sesko "weird". There's a bit, where Schmeichel qualifies his remarks by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, cut that. No one wants that. Simply ensure "weird" and "Sesko" appear together in the headline. People will be outraged.

The Season of Potential and Premature Judgment

Mid-autumn has traditionally one of my preferred periods to watch football. Leaves fall, the wind turns, the teams and tactics are still fresh, everything is new and yet patterns are emerging. Key players of the coming months are staking their claims. The transfer window is shut. Nobody is talking about the multiple trophies yet. All teams are still in the game. Right now, anything is possible.

However, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has also been one of my most disliked times to consume news on football. For while no outcomes are decided, opinions must be formed immediately. The City winger is resurgent. The German talent has been a crushing disappointment. Is Antoine Semenyo the best player in the league right now? Please an answer immediately.

Sesko as Patient Zero

And for numerous reasons, Sesko feels like the archetype in this context, a player inextricably trapped between football's opposing, unavoidable forces. The need to withhold final conclusions, allowing layers of technical texture and tactical sophistication to mature. And the imperative to produce permanent verdicts, a constant stream of takes and jokes, out-of-context condemnations and pointless contrasts, a square that can never truly be solved.

It is not my aim to offer a in-depth evaluation of Sesko's stint at United to date. The guy has started on four occasions in the Premier League in a highly unpredictable team, found the net twice, and had a mere of 116 touches. What exactly are we evaluating? And do I propose to replicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two of England's leading pundits duel passionately on a popular show over whether he needs 10 goals to be deemed successful this year (one pundit), or whether it's really more like 12 or 13 (the other).

A Cruel Environment

Despite this I enjoyed watching Sesko at his former club: a powerful, screeching racing car of a striker, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his talents: afforded the license to rampage but also the leeway to fail. And in part this is why Manchester United feels like the cruellest place he could possibly be right now: a place where "brutal verdicts" are handed down in roughly the duration it takes to load a short advertisement, the club with the largest and most pitiless gap between the patience and space he needs, and the time and air he is going to get.

There was a case of this during the national team pause, when a widely shared infographic handily stated that the player had been deemed – decisively – the poorest acquisition of the recent market by a survey of 20 agents. Naturally, the media are not alone in this. Club channels, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a oddly high number of pornbot followers: everybody with a vested interest is now basically operating along the identical rules, an ecosystem deliberately nosed towards provocation.

The Mental Cost

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What is happening to us? Do we realize, on some level, what this infinite sluice of aggravation is doing to our brains? Separate from the essential weirdness of playing in the middle of this, knowing on some surreal chain-reaction level that every single thing about them is now essentially material, product, public property to be repackaged and exchanged.

Indeed, partly this is because it's Manchester United, the entity that continues to feed the narrative, a big club that must constantly be producing the big feelings. But also, in part this is a temporary malaise, a swing of judgment most clearly and cruelly observed at this time of year, about a month after the window has closed. Throughout the summer we have been coveting players, eulogising them, salivating over them. Now, just a few weeks in, a lot of those very players are now being disdained as broken goods. Should we start to be concerned about a new signing? Was Arsenal's purchase of Viktor Gyökeres wise? What was the point of another expensive buy?

A Wider Issue

It seems fitting that Sesko meets their rivals on the weekend: a team simultaneously on a long unbeaten run at their stadium in the league and somehow in their own state of feverish crisis, like filing a missing person’s report on someone who popped to the store half an hour ago. Defensively suspect. Mohamed Salah past his prime. Alexander Isak an expensive flop. Arne Slot bald.

Maybe we have failed to understand the way the storyline of football has started to replace football the actual game, to inflect the way we view it, an entire sport repivoted around talking points and immediate responses, an activity that occurs in the background while we browse through our devices, unable to disconnect from the saline drip of opinions and more takes. Perhaps Sesko bearing the brunt right now. But in a way, we're all sacrificing a part of the experience in this process.